|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Singapore
Democratic Party
|
|
|
|
BACK
TO HOME PAGE
|
|
|
|
Protests in
Singapore through the years

Members of the Open
Singapore Centre and the Think Centre at the Speakers'
Corner calling for the abolition of detention without
trial (10 Dec 2000)

Protesters against
the Iraq War outside the US Embassy (Feb 03)

The SDP marching at
the Woodlands Stadium during an election rally (5 May 06)

The Mr Brown
protest at the City Hall MRT Station (7 Jul 06)

A vigil outside
Queenstown prison (Nov- Dec 06)

Anti-death penalty
activists holding a vigil outside Changi prison (26 Jan
07)

Gay activists
conducting the Pink Picnic at the Botanic Gardens despite the
event being banned (9 Aug 07)
|
Special
feature
Why
dissent matters Chee Soon Juan 28 Aug
07
How many of us wouldn't give anything to rid ourselves
of pain?
Don't you just hate it when you accidentally
stub your toe in the middle of the night on your way to the
toilet (and muttered some expletive along the way) or scald
yourself on a hot stove? Pain. Who needs it?
Meet Grace, a
three-year old girl, who, by all accounts, is a happy child. But
unlike other children, little Gracie cannot feel pain. She
suffers from Congenital Insensitivity to Pain with Anhidrosis, or
CIPA, a rare neurological disorder that prevents her from feeling
pain.
When Grace started teething, she gnawed at her
gums, tongue and fingers till they bled. She would run and bang
her head against the wall because it seemed like a fun thing to
do. She would stomp her feet so hard that her ankles were swollen
and when she broke her leg, she didn't cry, she just dragged it
around. Understandably, people like Grace don't live very long.
|
|
|
Pain
performs the crucial function of providing feedback to our brains
so that we don't mutilate our own bodies. It is one of those
strange things in life that we expend much energy avoiding or
trying to rid ourselves of but cannot survive without.
You
know what I'm driving at. Dissent, like pain, provides that
indispensable feedback to the state without which society suffers
like a dysfunctional CIPA body destined for early destruction.
|
Dissent
prods, cajoles and, in cases of autocratic states, compels the
government to mend its ways to become a better one – one
that is responsive to the needs and aspirations of the people.
|
|
Dissent
prods, cajoles and, in cases of autocratic states, compels the
government to mend its ways to become a better one – one
that is responsive to the needs and aspirations of the
people.
Pushing back
Singaporeans know this.
This is why through the years, despite the near total clampdown
on the expression of dissent, people of this nation have not
relented.
In 2002, a handful of individuals attempted to
gather outside the American embassy to protest against the war in
Iraq. The police had to move quickly to ensure that the puny
gathering of six didn't take place.
Falungong
practitioners have repeatedly challenged repressive laws by
defying orders not to gather in public and say anything to offend
the Chinese communist government.
Then there was the
white-elephant cardboard protest against the Government's refusal
to open the Buangkok MRT station even though construction was
completed and the facility was ready for use.
On the eve
of the executions of Nguyen Van Tuong and Amara Tochi, anti-death
penalty activists assembled at Changi to oppose the mandatory
death sentence for drug peddlers.
Thirty participants
donned brown tees and congregated at an MRT station to express
their opposition to the removal of Government-jibing satirist Mr
Lee Kin Mun's, aka Mr Brown, column in the Today
newspaper.
And despite police threats and harassment
nearly 20 people filed down Orchard Road in conspicuous yellow
last December, distributing copies of the UN's Universal
Declaration of Human Rights.
The gay and lesbian community
also did their part. They organised two public events, one a
picnic and the other a jog, to vent their grievances against the
criminalisation of homosexuals. Despite the authorities banning
both activities, the picnic went ahead (with an even greater
number of picnickers turning up in defiance) and the joggers
proceeded with their run albeit singly rather than as a group.
And in the last week or so, the local Internet scene has
been abuzz with talk about a black-shirt protest at 4 pm on 8
Sept 2007 at the Centrepoint Shopping Centre. The protest is in
response to the Government's plan to force Singaporeans to
purchase annuity for their retirement. The speed and
determination with which the protest was planned (on an online
forum called the Sammyboy's
Coffee Shop) clearly rattled the authorities so
much so that they have resorted to sowing confusion, discrediting
protest planners, and intimidating potential participants in an
attempt to thwart the initiative.
Even lone individuals
have taken the initiative to defy laws designed to silence
dissenting voices. Martyn See's production of political films has
brought to light the perversity of the Films Act which forbids
the production of such videos. The police investigated him for 15
months and ultimately issued him a warning.
We are not
alone
Wittingly or otherwise, these citizens were
engaging the state using Nonviolent Action. Some of the
activities were acts of civil disobedience where activists defied
the authorities in attempts to challenge repressive laws. (I have
discussed the concept and practice of civil disobedience in The
Power of Courage as well as here
and here
on this website, and will not elaborate them in this essay.)
But not only have activists pushed the boundaries of
political dissent in the local context, they have also reached
out to the international community for support.
|
A
singular act of dissent never yields immediate results. Every
action leaves behind a residue that the next one builds upon.
The experience gained and the courage that radiates from that
action elevates the general struggle another notch.
|
The Falungong human
rights activists have taken their case all the way to the UN,
forcing the Singapore Government to come out of its comfort zone
to defend its actions. The anti-death penalty campaign, largely
through the efforts of M Ravi, has attracted the attention of the
UN. The recent visit of British actor Ian McKellan and his
comments on the discrimination against homosexuals as well as the
ban of Professor Douglas Sanders' speech has kept the issue of
the criminalisation of gays alive among interested foreign
onlookers. Martyn See's films have received international
attention and screenings because of the police investigation.
|
|
More
recently, a group of local civil society actors met with their
regional counterparts to discuss how the Singaporean public can
be consulted and involved over the crafting of the ASEAN Charter,
which promises to include the respect of human rights. And, of
course, the Singapore Democrats continue to widen and strengthen
our international network to ensure that news of repression here
is carried well beyond our shores.
Are things
a-changing?
But has all this huffing and puffing
gotten human rights anywhere in Singapore?
The honest
answer is not very far. The PAP doesn't seem to have budged very
much on the issue. However, to see the fight in such parochial
terms is to miss the point completely.
A singular act of
dissent never yields immediate results. Every action leaves
behind a residue that the next one builds upon. The experience
gained and the courage that radiates from that action elevates
the general struggle another notch. Even for actions that fail to
achieve their stated objectives, there is gain. Every time we
initiate an action and fail, we don't return to ground zero.
It
is the accumulation of each protest and each act of resistance
that will ultimately take us above the threshold and allow us the
success that we seek. In the meantime, every action, big or
small, successful or not, is like a training session where
citizen-activists hone their skills and build up towards the
stage when our objectives are definitively achieved.
|
|
Overcoming fear
For this to take place, however, we need to recognise
the obstacles before us. One big one sits like a boulder in the
middle of the road. Its called fear Fear immobilizes. It preys on
the weak-minded. It is what the PAP relies on to achieve its
ends.
|
For
fear is the currency of repression and repression itself is the
language of the weak.
|
|
But if this is the
PAP's tactic of choice, it is also the people's greatest hope.
For fear is the currency of repression and repression itself is
the language of the weak. Time and again, it has been shown that
confronted by peoples who have liberated themselves from the
clutches of fear, despotic powers have cracked and given way to
popular will.
Powers-that-be generate fear by hoarding
information and spreading misinformation. In another words, they
need to keep those that they rule in a state of relative
ignorance. Governments also generate fear by ensuring the
atomization of society where each individual is corralled to
become an island unto himself. When citizens are prevented from
coming together, they are unable to disseminate information,
exchange views and organise themselves.
This is why the
PAP squats on the media and bans every application for public
political activity. In the age of the Internet, however,
curtailing the flow of information and keeping minds apart is
like trying to breath in all the air so that no one else can have
it. To paraphrase Ol' Abe: You can co-opt some of the people all
of the time, and you can intimidate all of the people some of the
time, but you cannot silence all the people all of the time.
But as much as the Internet affords us the opportunity to
receive and share information speedily, it does not facilitate
the physical congregation of citizens. For this, we need to look
into ourselves.
|
|
We must recognise
that fear will not disappear, it is here to stay. (But do we
really want it to go away? Think about it: Without fear, can
there be courage?) The truth is that whatever we do we must act
despite our fears. Nelson Mandela taught: Courage is not the
absence of fear but the triumph over it. This is where our spirit
as human beings must shine through. Courage is about personal
integrity as much as it is about civic responsibility.
|
Take
baby-steps if you must, but do take that first liberating step.
It is uncertain, I concede. It is scary. It is challenging. It
is empowering. And it is worth it.
|
|
Paying
the price
The courage to act in spite of our fears is
what we need and need in abundance in Singapore today. Our lives
are no longer ours. We have forsaken them at the altar of Mammon.
We have compromised abjectly on our sense of justice, on our
sense of right and wrong for which there will be a price to
pay.
In the final analysis, it is those individuals who
dare and dare greatly for the sake of humanity that has made this
world a more tolerable place for the rest of us.
As many
of you wrestle with your fears about taking part in citizens'
actions and other forms of protest, remember one thing: You serve
the critical function that is akin to that of physiological pain
in our bodies. We must not let the absence of pain deceive our
body politic.
I recognize that you may not want to plunge
into the deep-end of activism right from the beginning. Take
baby-steps if you must, but do take that first liberating step.
It is uncertain, I concede. It is scary. It is challenging. It is
empowering. And it is worth it.
I read with great profit
Henry David Thoreau's Civil Disobedience, a paper
published in 1848 that changed the world. Allow me to share a few
of his words with you:
For
it matters not how small the beginning may seem to be: what is
once well done is done forever...
|